Medveileder Håkon Dahl-Olsen
Oppgaven vil gå ut på å sette opp en dynamisk modell av en satsvis destillasjonsprosess og bruke tilgjengelig teori til å designe et selvoptimaliserende reguleringssystem for denne kolonnen. Ytelsen av reguleringssystemet skal vurderes ved å se på avvik i objektfunksjonen. Et av følgende mål kan velges for driften av prosessen:1. Maks produkt med gitt minimumsrenhet ved fast driftstid per batch
2. Minimum tid for gitt renhet og mengde (absolutt eller gjenvinningsgrad)
Naturlige beregningsverktøy vil
være gProms og Matlab.
Oppgaven krever interesse for optimalisering og numeriske beregninger.
Se hjemmeside S. Skogestad for mer informasjon
3. Dynamic
Model and Control of Brobekk
incineration plant
Oppgavebeskrivelse:
2.
Bestemme optimale
driftsparametere for ulike
driftsforhold (sommer/vinter, dag/natt).
3.
Utvikle en optimal
reguleringsstruktur for
anlegget basert på minst mulig fysiske endringer i forhold til
det virkelige
anlegget.
4.
Utvikle en ideell
reguleringsstruktur for
anlegget.
5.
Vurdere, og eventuelt
implementere, MPC som
tillegg til reguleringsstrukturen i punkt 3. og/eller 4.
4. Use of dynamic degrees of freedom for tighter bottleneck control and maximum throughput5. Dynamic simulation for improved operation of the Snøhvit CO2 removal section.
Reserved for Theogene, Uwarwema
Background:
Maximizing throughput in a network is a common problem in several settings
(Phillips et al.,1976; Ahuja et al., 1993). From network theory, the
max-flow min-cut theorem states that the maximum throughput in a plant
(network) is limited by the ”bottleneck” of the network. In order to
maximize the throughput, the flow through the bottleneck should be at its
maximum flow. In particular, if the actual flow at the bottleneck is not at
its maximum at any given time, then this gives a loss in production which
can never be recovered (sometimes referred to as a ”lost opportunity”).
The back off is an unavoidable “safety factor” because perfect dynamic
control is not possible. Choosing a small back off, improves the profit
(throughput) but increases the risk of not being able to have feasible
operation (satisfying constraints) when a large disturbance occurs. The
necessary back off can generally be reduced by improving the control around
the bottleneck unit. “Improved control” is usually obtained by retuning the
loops to obtain smaller variation.
Project proposal:
To obtain tighter bottleneck control, dynamic degrees of freedom like
hold-up volumes can be used, and hence reduce the back off. In this project
we want to simulate a more realitic process like distillation columns in
series and using the sump volumes in the columns as dynamic degrees of
freedom for tighter bottleneck control. Two apporaches for control is
considered:
1) Adding bias directly to the level controlles upstream the bottleneck
2) Using MPC (like SEPTIC) to manipulate on the level control set points.
The two approaches should be discussed and also compared.
Reserved for Jalal Fahadi [
StatoilHydro has developed a d-spice dynamic process simulation model of the CO2 removal section at Snøhvit. It is known that the the amine absorbtion process is simplified modelled in d-spice, and that the real process responds in a different way than the d-spice model with regards to temperature changes and the amount of MEG present in the amine solution. The d-spice model is used to train operators, develop MPC applications and solve operational challenges.
Proposed project tasksl:
1) Perform model updating and verification of the d-spice model
against process data and labdata using eg OPC connection and matlab
2) Develop estimators of unmeasured process parameters like MEG content
in the amine using Septic
3) Use of dynamic simulation to solve operational challenges
Medveileder, StatoilHydro: Ingvild Løvik Sperle
--
************************************************************************
Sigurd Skogestad, Professor and Head of Department Phone: +47-7359-4154
Department of Chemical Engineering Home: +47-7390-2625
Norwegian Univ. of Science and Technology (NTNU) Fax: +47-7359-4080
N-7491 Trondheim, Norway Mobile:+47-9137-1669
http://www.nt.ntnu.no/users/skoge email: skoge@ntnu.no
************************************************************************